Thursday, August 12, 2010

The Poor, The Pirates And The Ballerinas

# Dr Gary K. Busch
# August 10, 2010

On August 7th, the fiftieth anniversary of its independence, the politicians of the Ivory Coast announced that the oft-postponed national elections would take place on October 31, 2010. Unfortunately, for the large bulk of the Ivoirian population this election is a cruel joke. Elections are meant to resolve problems; to clarify the political power issues; to charge political victors and parties with the responsibilities for the programs they campaigned for during the election. In this election the parties do not have programs; half the country is occupied by a piratical rabble of failed soldiers; no disarmament of the rebels has effectively taken place; no legitimacy is ascribed to the voting rolls or the electoral process; the occupying French forces and their UN supporters dominate the security of the country; and the aged and fading political party ballerinas from the past refuse to allow younger, more agile, performers to take on the major roles. It is a shambles and fools no one.

The origin of the word ’idiot’ is from the ancient Greek. It originally meant a free-born Athenian citizen with the right to vote. Later usages of the word through the Romans and subsequent cultures depict an idiot as someone of low intellect and easily fooled. The citizens of the Ivory Coast are being treated as ‘idiots’ right now; despite the fact that they have the right to vote their political masters are treating them as if they were of low intellect and are busy spending their time trying to fool them. The political leaders assert that there can be a vote for a new President when there has been no reuniting of the country; no disarmament of the rebels; the continued occupation of their country by the French soldiers and the UN; no social programs in place; no promises of how change might be effected; nor on what basis the idiots can choose among several grotesquely uninspiring candidates for office; each with an appalling record of previous rule.

What no one seems to have addressed is the fundamental question of the reunification of the country in advance of the election. The rebellion split the country in 2002. The North, where the rebels live, has been governed by tin pot warlords with no semblance of any civic responsibility. There has been virtually no education taking place in the North. There are no banks. There are no hospitals. Taxes aren’t collected. Rents aren’t paid. Roads and schools crumble. On average about under half of Côte d’Ivoire’s 20 million people now live below the poverty threshold, on less than about US$1.25 per day; the worst level in 20 years. The biggest industry is taking products from the farmers and selling them abroad without any taxes, customs or revenue, and importing tax-free goods for sale in the North It is a piratical enterprise subsidised by the poor of the South who do pay for their government services and whose contributions keep the transport links, water and electric power flowing to a North whose occupied indigenes pay nothing but tribute to the warlords of their region. In a time of record cocoa prices the farm gate prices paid to the growers has not risen. The value added goes to the pirates of the North and to the faded prima donnas of the South who are parasites on major international industrial agribusinesses.

The imposed peace of Linas-Marcoussis left a divided country with armed troops facing each other over a dividing line. Despite major efforts to get the rebels (and indeed the loyal militias) to disarm it has been a sham and a pretence. The rebels have demanded to be integrated into a National Army they fought against and are even demanding back pay for the time they were traitorously attacking the same army. They have proposed integration as opposed to real disarmament. The politicians have suggested that integration of the forces is the same thing as disarmament. The integration of forces is not the same thing as disarmament. Disarmament is removing weapons from the hands of people who are not authorised to have them. This was made clear by General Gaston Houseman Kone, Coordinator of the PNDDR (the disarmament process). He emphasised that disarmament meant taking weapons from the hands of those who do not have the right to bear them.

This is not some abstruse formulation. In the war against the elected government of Gbagbo, the forces gathered in the various rebel groupings were illegally armed and were often formed from Liberian, Sierra Leonean, Burkinabe and Gabonese privateers seeking plunder, rape and mayhem. Troops from Burkina Faso were transported south in army trucks. The French flew in planeload after planeload of weapons, communications equipment and artillery for the rebels. Anybody over the age of twelve had some sort of weapon. They still have them. They made up the large band of ‘irregulars’ that constitute at least 80% of the New Forces. This is not an army; it is an armed mob. On the loyalist side as well there were ‘militias’ who armed themselves for protection and to seek to defeat the rebels who were attacking them. They, too, remain armed. At the various peace negotiations, from Linas-Marcoussis onwards, it was recognised that for peace to take place these groups must be disarmed. This is the main sticking point with the rebels and their spokesman, Soro (now the Prime Minister). The rebels will not disarm; they have baulked at every deadline; refused to honour every timetable for disarmament. It is a fact of the peace process. Even now they demand a heavy price for keeping the situation as it is. Military issues could again undermine efforts aimed at organizing the elections. In a recent meeting of the top domestic and foreign militaries in Yamoussoukro, the New Forces military commander Soumaila Bakayoko presented a budget for the disarmament program that runs into hundreds of billions of Francs CFA. Unless they receive this money they ‘cannot’ disarm’ they say.

This has had a major role in preventing the preparation of a proper voter’s roll so that elections could take place. There are many ‘no-go’ areas of the North where it has been impossible to adequately inspect the documents and the entitlement of thousands of people. Despite spending millions of francs of European aid through the French company, SAGEM, to prepare the voter’s roll the process has been an expensive shambles in which no one believes. There is growing concern about “phantom voters”

The problem with trying to rectify these problems is that there is a government which is at war with itself. After Linas-Marcoussis and the subsequent agreements since 2002, culminating in the Ouagadougou Agreement the Cabinet is made up of representatives from the legitimate parties of the past (FPI, PDCI, RDR, PIT) and a bunch of jumped up warlord rebel parties. Each has its own ministry or ministries at its disposal. The recent government reshuffle didn’t change much but the cast of characters. There is no Cabinet; there is competitive anarchy. These imposed Cabinet members draw hefty salaries and expenses and ride in chauffeur-driven cars as they plot the downfall of their Cabinet colleagues and the impoverishment of their fellow citizens. The National Assembly has not been elected since 2000 and many of the delegates are dead, dying or haven’t visited their constituencies in years. They present no hope for the populace.

Just there is lawless theft in the North the South is not much better. In the years since the rebellion the power brokers of the South have found an accommodation with the companies which thrive in the large rich harvests of cocoa and coffee. Even more importantly they have taken large pieces of the burgeoning oil and gas businesses which are expanding rapidly. A new refinery is being built. New pipelines are being connected. The rebels in the North have not had a chance to dine at those tables so feel that what they steal from the public purse is justified in comparison to what the Southern politicians are harvesting. The recent case of Desire Tagro’s dispensation of cash to the pilgrims, who was unsurprisingly found innocent, demonstrates the size of the political cash pot available. There are many fat cats in the South who are thriving on a divided country. They use the excuse of the occupation of the rebels in the North as a hunchback uses his hump as an excuse for everything that happens. Just as the rebels in the North are not likely to give up their piratical enterprises for a peace and national unity where they go back to being shoemakers and truck drivers; the fat cats of the South are not going to take the fast money from the business community and put that cash into roads, schools, electricity and hospitals. That is why the election is a sham.

The faded prima donnas like Bedie, Ouattara, Banny, Gbagbo and their ilk are no longer able to perform their pas de deux or arabesques penchée with any smoothness of motion. They are tired, played out and uninspiring. The only result of the election is to be ‘more of the same’. Putting the mark of the idiot alongside someone’s name is not going to change the Ivory Coast.

This begs the question of how this was allowed to happen and to thrive. Surely this was not what the people of the Ivory Coast wanted. The answer to the external question “Cui bono?” is the French. The system of the Pacte Coloniale set the scene for this state of learned dependence. The vultures of French business have returned en masse to the Ivory Coast. The French have conned the United Nations in supporting their military presence there. The death grip on the Ivory Coast finances of the CFA franc and the control of the economy by the French Treasury has made economic independence a sick and feeble joke. Nothing has changed very much in the fifty years of Ivory Coast’s independence except that local politicians have cut themselves into the action in the French exploitation and control of the country. There is a rude but accurate saying which originated in Argentina but which can be applied just as well to the Ivory Coast – “If shit had value, the poor would be born without assholes.”

This is my last term in power - Kagame

President Paul Kagame has said he does not intend to change the country’s constitution to extend his last presidential term beyond 2017.



Speaking on Contact FM, a local radio based in Kigali on a show hosted by Ugandan journalist Andrew Mwenda, Mr Kagame said, “Personally I don’t want to be involved or in changing the constitution so that I stay in power and particularly changing the constitution for that purpose. I would really hate it.”


He added: “I don’t know why it (change term-limits in a constitution) has been made an African thing. I have seen Europeans attempt to change their constitutions. I saw it in France when (Jacques) Chirac was about to run for a third term. I don’t know why in other places it is not of interest and it has become an African thing. I don’t intend to change the constitution.”

Mr Kagame, who the country’s electoral body officially announced the winner of Monday’s presidential election, said he could have easily been president in 1994 slightly after the genocide but declined the office which Pasteur Bizimungu occupied until March 23, 2000.



“I refused to be the president. And somebody was president for six years. Now people are already talking about it (succession). The same reasons I should have stayed in power (after 2017) are the same reasons I shouldn’t. If you have had a Kagame around for this long and he has failed to identify one who has a capacity to take over, I would take that as a failure on my part,” he added.


Mr Kagame is yet to be sworn in as the new president of Rwanda for a constitutionally provided second and last seven-year term.

I removed Binaisa, reveals Museveni

By Henry Mukasa

PRESIDENT Yoweri Museveni deposed former president Godfrey Lukongwa Binaisa because he let political schemers manipulate his short-lived presidency, he told mourners yesterday.

However, by the time Binaisa died, they had reconciled, the President added.

Speaking at Binaisa’s burial in Nateete, a Kampala suburb, Museveni also said he participated in the ouster of President Yusuf Kironde Lule over dishonesty.

Binaisa, 90, was buried at Mackay Church of Uganda next to his father’s grave. The former head of state died in his sleep at his home in Makindye on August 5. He received a 21-gun salute.

The Uganda Police pall-bearers handled the body as the Police band played dirges.

Museveni said he met Binaisa in the 1970s at Kilimanjaro Hotel when allied forces based in Tanzania were plotting to overthrow dictator Idi Amin. Binaisa impressed him as an articulate and humorous person, he noted.

“When we got here, we got problems with Lule because he forgot us. He said, ‘I am the President, forget all what we discussed in Moshi.’ I said, ‘whoever forgets people who help him to get where he is deserves a punishment.’ We toppled Lule. I took part in removing Lule because he did not follow what we agreed.”

Museveni recalled that during the search for Lule’s successor, he proposed Binaisa, who had to compete with Edward Rugumayo and the late Paulo Muwanga.

Because Muwanga scored a dismal three votes, his camp asked Rugumayo to withdraw from the race and Binaisa became president. He reigned between June 20, 1979 and May 12, 1980.

“Our group put Binaisa in power. Those who talk about Binaisa should know where he came from,” Museveni recounted.

He said the political problem of the day was treachery, dishonesty and lies, which, he said, still prevail. Months into power, the President recalled, Binaisa was convinced by conspirators to remove Museveni from the defence ministry because he was “a stumbling block”.

Buli omu yali ali mu kibalo (everyone was scheming). DP and UPC were moving around with a calculator instead of seeking consensus and we move as a team. I wondered; ‘How could my friend who I brought sack me as minister on radio?’ That’s how I fell out with Binaisa,” Museveni explained.

“Our calculation was scientific. I decided we needed to get rid of Binaisa because he had become a problem,” Museveni stated.

The President said he met Binaisa in Libya and re-united with him. “When we came to power (in 1986), he was in the United States and we called him back,” Museveni said.

“I am very glad for the last ten years Binaisa was here (from exile). We have been interacting. I had forgotten that he sacked me. I am glad he died when we had reconciled and we are here to celebrate his life. May his soul rest in eternal peace.”

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

The Speech Declaring Nigeria’s Independence

Alhaji Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa

The Speech Declaring Nigeria’s Independence by Nigeria’s First Prime Minister Alhaji Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa – October 1, 1960

Today is Independence Day. The first of October 1960 is a date to which for two years, Nigeria has been eagerly looking forward. At last, our great day has arrived, and Nigeria is now indeed an independent Sovereign nation.

Words cannot adequately express my joy and pride at being the Nigerian citizen privileged to accept from Her Royal Highness these Constitutional Instruments which are the symbols of Nigeria’s Independence. It is a unique privilege which I shall remember forever, and it gives me strength and courage as I dedicate my life to the service of our country. This is a wonderful day, and it is all the more wonderful because we have awaited it with increasing impatience, compelled to watch one country after another overtaking us on the road when we had so nearly reached our goal. But now, we have acquired our rightful status, and I feel sure that history will show that the building of our nation proceeded at the wisest pace: it has been thorough, and Nigeria now stands well-built upon firm foundations.

Today’s ceremony marks the culmination of a process which began fifteen years ago and has now reached a happy and successful conclusion. It is with justifiable pride that we claim the achievement of our Independence to be unparalleled in the annals of history. Each step of our constitutional advance has been purposefully and peacefully planned with full and open consultation, not only between representatives of all the various interests in Nigeria but in harmonious cooperation with the administering power which has today relinquished its authority. At the time when our constitutional development entered upon its final phase, the emphasis was largely upon self-government: We, the elected representatives of the people of Nigeria, concentrated on proving that we were fully capable of managing our own affairs both internally and as a nation. However, we were not to be allowed the selfish luxury of focusing our interest on our own homes.

In these days of rapid communications, we cannot live in isolation, apart from the rest of the world, even if we wished to do so. All too soon it has become evident that for us, independence implies a great deal more than self-government. This great country, which has now emerged without bitterness or bloodshed, finds that she must at once be ready to deal with grave international issues. This fact has of recent months been unhappily emphasised by the startling events which have occurred in this continent. I shall not belabour the point but it would be unrealistic not to draw attention first to the awe-inspiring task confronting us at the very start of our nationhood. When this day in October 1960 was chosen for our Independence, it seemed that we were destined to move with quiet dignity to our place on the world stage. Recent events have changed the scene beyond recognition, so that we find ourselves today being tested to the utmost. We are called upon immediately to show that our claims to responsible government are well-founded, and having been accepted as an independent state, we must at once play an active part in maintaining the peace of the world and in preserving civilisation.

I promise you, we shall not fall for want of determination. And we come to this task better-equipped than many. For this, I pay tribute to the manner in which successive British governments have gradually transferred the burden of responsibility to our shoulders. The assistance and unfailing encouragement which we received from each Secretary of State for the Colonies and their intense personal interest in our development has immeasurably lightened that burden. All our friends in the Colonial Office must today be proud of their handiwork and in the knowledge that they have helped to lay the foundations of a lasting friendship between our two nations. I have indeed every confidence that, based on the happy experience of a successful partnership, our future relations with the United Kingdom will be more cordial than ever, bound together, as we shall be in the Commonwealth, by a common allegiance to Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth, whom today we proudly acclaim as Queen of Nigeria and Head of the Commonwealth. Time will not permit the individual mention of all those friends, many of them Nigerians, whose selfless labours have contributed to our Independence. Some have not lived to see the fulfilment of their hopes – on them be peace – but nevertheless they are remembered here, and the names of buildings and streets and roads and bridges throughout the country recall to our minds their achievements, some of them on a national scale. Others confined, perhaps, to a small area in one Division, are more humble but of equal value in the sum-total.

Today, we have with us representatives of those who have made Nigeria: Representatives of the Regional Governments, of former Central Governments, of the Missionary Societies, and of the Banking and Commercial enterprises, and members, both past and present, of the Public Service. We welcome you, and we rejoice that you have been able to come and share in our celebrations. We wish that it could have been possible for all of those whom you represent to be here today. Many, I know, will be disappointed to be absent, but if they are listening to me now, I say to them: ‘Thank you on behalf of my countrymen. Thank you for your devoted service which helped to build up Nigeria into a nation. Today, we are reaping the harvest which you sowed, and the quality of the harvest is equalled only by our gratitude to you. May God bless you all. This is an occasion when our hearts are filled with conflicting emotions: we are, indeed, proud to have achieved our independence, and proud that our efforts should have contributed to this happy event. But do not mistake our pride for arrogance. It is tempered by feelings of sincere gratitude to all who have shored in the task of developing Nigeria politically, socially and economically.

We are grateful to the British officers whom we have known, first as masters, and then as leaders, and finally as partners, but always as friends. And there have been countless missionaries who have laboured unceasingly in the cause of education and to whom we owe many of our medical services. We are grateful also to those who have brought modern methods of banking and of commerce, and new industries. I wish to pay tribute to all of these people and to declare our everlasting admiration of their devotion to duty. And finally, I must express our gratitude to Her Royal Highness, the Princess Alexandra for personally bringing to us these symbols of our freedom and especially for delivering the gracious message from Her Majesty, The Queen. And so, with the words ‘God Save Our Queen’, I open a new chapter in the history of Nigeria and of the Commonwealth, and indeed, of the world.

Naomi Campbell & The Blood Diamonds

Naomi Campbell, that British super model, was recently subpoenaed by the World Court in Hague currently in judicial process against former Liberian war lord/president. The ex super model had refused to testify, saying “I am afraid it would put me and my loved ones in danger because this is someone that I read up on the Internet that killed thousands of people supposedly and I don't want my family in any danger in any way”.

Does anyone reading this blame the super model for wanting to protect her family? Or for that matter showing fear about a man called Charles Taylor? I think it’s unfair for the prosecutor to have suggested that Ms Campbell was downplaying her friendship with the former war lord when she exhibited such fear. But of course the whole thing may be much more than that especially when one of the other two witnesses testified that Campbell was flirting with the dictator. Never thrust a supermodel?

During the proceeding, Ms Campbell who met the then Liberian president in1997at a charity dinner hosted by the then South African President Nelson Mandela told the court: “When I was sleeping, I had a knock at my door. And I opened my door, and two men were there and gave me a pouch and said, ‘A gift for you’. I saw a few stones in there, and they were very small, dirty-looking stones”.

But the two witnesses – Ms Carole White, 60 and Actress Mia Farrow, 65 – who were there thirteen years ago disputed Campbell’s claim saying, the former model knew that she would receive a diamond gift from Mr. Taylor and that she was quite excited about it. While the actress said that it was Naomi Campbell herself who confined in her that Charles Taylor wanted to give her diamonds, White, Campbell’s former agent, declared that she was actually present when the diamonds were being delivered to Campbell. Never thrust an agent? Or even an actress? What exactly happened on that day in the Rainbow City? Perhaps only heaven knows.

In my opinion, the defence did a thorough job during cross-examination, and actually called White a liar saying she has motive for lying against Campbell. It could be recalled that White and Campbell are in another court case for breach of contract in which White is in the position to get millions of dollars if she wins. Suffice to say that the accounts of the three women differ. Oh gosh, it was thirteen years ago! And whose account the judges going to believe? I am waiting – anxiously.

Well, one may question the super model’s decision to accept a gift from two strangers, and for that matter not knowing who her admirer was. But then that should be her personal decision which I suppose she is entitled to. In fact, I am much more interested in the fact that Naomi did not take that diamonds out of South Africa. But then who among the guests is most likely to send a diamond gift to the super model? Hum….

“I do not recognise them as diamonds which I am accustomed to seeing shiny in a box,” Campbell says, adding that she had no idea that the stones were from Taylor, as the prosecution alleges. She maintains that she passed them along to a friend who worked for a children's charity connected to Mandela, asking that he use them to do something good.

Although the charity denied ever receiving them but the friend she passed them on to has confirmed it, and has since passed them on to the police. Thank God that Mr. Jeremy Ractliffe whom Campbell gave the diamonds is still alive otherwise the super model could have been labelled a liar. Well, many people had started doubting her evidence before Mr. Ractliffe gave the diamonds to the police.

Oh, if Campbell, who became one of the world's highest-paid models after being discovered while shopping in London at age 15 had kept the diamonds! Her enemies especially the media would have chopped her alive.

Headlines like these would have been used to bombard and insult our intelligence: Ex-Super Model Harlots for Blood Diamonds; Naomi Campbell Trades Beauty for Bloody Diamonds; War Lord Woos Super Model with Blood Diamonds; Super Diamonds for Super Model Sex; Naomi Campbell: Sex for Diamond etc.

I am happy for this woman for taking the path of honour by passing along the yeye diamonds to a charity organisation. By doing this, the self-styled super model has written her name in gold. She has shown that beauty and brain can go together. Campbell has demonstrated she has gut. And she has since issued a statement saying, “I have nothing to gain by not telling the truth”.

Thanks to her friend Ractliffe who had since shed light on the matter. Ractliffe said that Campbell had given him the stones as they rode on South Africa's famed Blue Train on Sept. 26, 1997. He said he had just kept the diamonds until recently, apparently not knowing what to do with them.

“I took them because I thought it might well be illegal for her to take uncut diamonds out of the country,” he said. Ractliffe added that Campbell had suggested the stones could benefit the Nelson Mandela Children's Fund, of which he was director at the time, “but I told her I would not involve the NMCF in anything that could possibly be illegal.

“In the end I decided I should just keep them and did not report the matter to the fund or anyone else “to protect the reputation of the NMCF, Mr. Mandela himself and Naomi Campbell, none of whom were benefiting in any way”.

I am happy for this young woman whose beauty even at 40 still radiates controversy – of sorts. They have called her a hot-tempered super model; they have accused her of violent outbursts; they have labeled her arrogant woman; and they have accused her of being a snob. I mean I need to borrow Olitan Ladipo super model question: “Who is on trial – Naomi or Taylor?

Only God knows what they would have called her had it been that she took the so called blood diamonds out of South Africa. It would have been the opportunity to kill her personality further, and all she had worked for. Again, I am happy for this woman whom the media and co were ready to destroy but saved by divine spirit of the moment.

Lastly, whilst I do like the fact that war lord Charles Taylor of Liberia is now being prosecuted at the world court for crimes against humanity, when is George Bush of America and his ilk in the so-called God Country will be prosecuted for crimes against humanity as a result of what happened in Iraq? Or you want to tell me you do not know about Mr. Bush’s crime?

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Confronting Corruption

StandPoint

Confronting Corruption


August 09, 2010

Jackie Selebi, former South Africa police boss and former President of Interpol was recently convicted and sentenced to 15 years in jail for taking bribes of over R1.2 million ($157,000) in bribes since 2000. Tafa Balogun, Nigeria’s former police boss was convicted of stealing about N17 billion (or over $100 million). Today, he is not only a free man, but has retained his National Honours of the Commander of the Order of the Niger (CON). Former Bayelsa state governor Depreye Alamieyeseigha was convicted of stealing about N126 billion (nearly $1 billion) over a six year period from his state. Today, he is also a free man and elder statesman.

The top echelon of Nigeria’s political leadership has been named as beneficiaries in the $180 million Halliburton scandal. Prominent ministers, senators, and members of the ruling PDP were also named in the Siemens scandal. The Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas company (LNG) claims it paid $5 billion into NNPC’s account, but the money simply varnished. Nothing has been heard in any of these cases. At the moment, the Senate has several members who have pending cases of corruption, but who in all likelihood will escape conviction, if they ever get to trial.

The foregoing instances are symptomatic of the attitude of Nigeria to corruption and why it will be an uphill task to rid the country of the menace.

So what needs to be done?

Nigeria has several agencies established to fight corruption. These include the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC), the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB), the Fiscal Responsibility Commission (FRC) and a plethora of other agencies. Collectively, these agencies have barely scratched the corruption conundrum. The obvious conclusion is that no matter the number of agencies set up to fight corruption, they will not succeed unless and until there is an Ethical Revolution because ultimately, corruption is a personal choice. Despite these problems, measures should be taken to strengthen and make these agencies more effective and independent.

a) Monitoring of Corruption Agencies. We call for the scrutiny of these agencies by an independent Ombudsman funded through a first-line charge from the federal revenue pool.

b) Unbundling of Corruption Agencies. Our corruption is simply too widespread, too entangled and too massive for only a couple of institutions to handle without being bogged down or compromised. The EFCC and the ICPC should therefore be unbundled along the same lines recommended by the Justice Uwais Panel for INEC. In this schema, 419 issues, for instance, would be handled by a body focusing on that issue; federal economic crimes would be separated from State/Local Government economic crime; and one arm of the ICPC would deal with anticipatory stealing.


Beyond agency reform, we also recommend the following:

  • Public sector reform. The core civil servants number over 100,000 but contribute little to policy development and implementation. The public sector at the federal, state, and local government levels employ millions of incompetent, ill-trained, and ill-equipped staff who do little more than collect salaries every month. Government must realize that the civil service is NOT a welfare service.
  • Introduce Benefits to reduce the motivation for theft. Theft is often fueled by unemployment among youth and the absence of unemployment benefits. The introduction of unemployment benefits and old age benefits would significantly reduce the urge to engage in corrupt practices.
  • Tie Government Contracts to Job Creation. All tiers of government spend trillions of naira every year awarding contracts. Tying the award of contracts to the number of jobs beneficiary companies would create would generate millions of jobs and reduce the burden of joblessness and poverty which fan corruption.
  • The passage of the Freedom of Information Bill with strong whistle-blower protection provisions.
  • Creation of a publicly-accessible website at all levels of government to track government spending, budget proposals, legislative hearings on them, finalized budgets, contract awards, deliverables, progress, and completion dates in real time. The vigilance of civil society groups would be critical to the efficacy of this innovation.
  • Penalties for convicted offenders must be exacted in full. To convict criminals then release them within weeks encourages corruption.
  • A fiscally federalized system of resource allocation would ultimately compel rulers to be more accountable to their proximate constituencies. Localized systems of accountability and citizen vigilance work better than national ones.
  • Remove the barriers to credit in the economy. A key motivation for corruption in Nigeria is our 'cash-and -carry' economic system that does not allow for instalmental payment for goods and services. Creating access to credit via credit-rating systems, access to bank loans will help reduce the motivation to steal.
  • Citizen Vigilance: We the people must continue to consistently demand transparency from those in authority, because corruption persists only where the people permit it. Taming corruption is a job for every one of us. Taking the time to register and actually casting your vote on Election Day is probably the biggest effort you can make in the fight against corruption. By voting candidates with the best anti-corruption credentials and holding them to their words, we would be using our most potent weapon- democracy- to fight a national malaise.

In the final analysis, we do not expect these measures to completely halt the cancer of corruption. But corruption can and must be defeated if Nigeria is to have any chance for structured political and economic development.

________________

The StandPoint is the consensual position of the NVS editorial board.

Fidel Castro speech on 40th anniversary of Cuban revolution

Fidel Castro speech on 40th anniversary of Cuban revolution

Santiago du Cuba, 1 January 1999

Speech given by Fidel Castro Ruz, first secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba and president of the Councils of State and Ministers, at the main ceremony for the 40th anniversary of the triumph of the Revolution, in Santiago de Cuba, on January 1, 1999, Year of the 40th Anniversary of the Triumph of the Revolution (Translation of the transcript of the Council of State)

People of Santiago: Compatriots in all of Cuba:

I am trying to recall that night of January 1, 1959; I am reliving and perceiving impressions and details as if everything were occurring at this very moment. It seems unreal that destiny has given us the rare privilege of once more speaking to the people of Santiago de Cuba from this very same place, 40 years later.

Before dawn on that day, with the arrival of the news that the dictator and the main figures of his opprobrious regime had fled in the face of the irrepressible advance of our forces, for a few seconds I felt a strange sensation of emptiness. How was that incredible victory possible in just over 24 months, starting from that moment on December 18, 1956, when - after the extremely severe setback which virtually annihilated our detachment - we managed to gather together seven rifles to resume the battle against a combination of military forces which totaled 800,000 armed men, thousands of trained officers, high morale, attractive privileges, a totally unquestioned myth of invincibility, infallible advising and guaranteed supplies from the United States? Just ideas which a valiant people claimed as their own worked a military and political victory. Subsequent vain and ridiculous attempts to salvage what remained of that exploiting and oppressive system were swept away by the Rebel Army, the workers and the rest of the people in 24 hours.

Our fleeting sadness at the moment of victory was nostalgia for the experiences we had lived through, the vivid memory of the comrades who fell throughout the struggle, a full awareness that those exceptionally difficult and adverse years obliged us to be better than we were, and to transform them into the most fruitful and creative ones of our lives. We had to abandon our mountains, our rural life, our habits of absolute and obligatory austerity, our tense life of constant vigilance in the face of an enemy that could appear by land or air at any moment of the 761 days of the war; a healthy, hard, pure life and one of great sacrifices and shared dangers, in which men become brothers and their best virtues flourish, together with the infinite capacity for commitment, selflessness and altruism that all humans carry within them.

The enormous difference in equipment and strength between the enemy and us forced us to do the impossible. Suffice it to say that we won the war with rifles and anti-tank mines, in every important action always fighting against the enemy's artillery, armored vehicles and, in particular, airplanes, which were always immediately present in any military action.

We seized rifles and other semi-automatic and automatic light infantry weapons from the enemy in combat, and the explosives with which, in rustic workshops, we manufactured the shells we used against armored vehicles and their accompanying infantry always came from the rain of bombs which they launched against us, some of which failed to explode. The infallible tactic of attacking the enemy when it was on the move was a key factor. The art of provoking those forces into moving out of their well-fortified and generally invulnerable positions became one of our commands' greatest skills.

Enemy operations units and their garrisons were besieged, their reinforcements were destroyed or they were forced to surrender out of hunger and thirst, under constant fire from our marksmen, who tightened their circle every day avoiding frontal attacks, which cost many lives when adequate equipment and weapons are unavailable. What we learned in the mountains and dense forest areas was applied there in the lowland areas, on paved highways, under cover of citrus plantations, fruit orchards and even cane fields, which served to conceal our troops, generally rookies, given the accelerated growth of our ranks as arms were acquired, although always under the command of more experienced comrades, mounting surprise attacks on reinforcements. The same method wound up being applied within the cities, isolating the garrison's various positions.

That was how the city of Palma Soriano was taken in just three days, and that was how the plan was conceived to attack and take control of the garrison of 5000 men in the Santiago de Cuba plaza, with the deployment of 1200 rebel troops. Previously, 100 of the weapons taken in Palma had been brought in through Santiago Bay to start the uprising, five days before the start of operations where the four battalions defending the periphery gradually moved in to encircle the city. I am omitting more precise details of the plan conceived. I will simply note that there was one rebel fighter for every four enemy soldiers. We had never had a more favorable balance of forces.

The battle was initiated in Guisa, a few kilometers from Bayamo, by 180 men, who were to fight against reinforcements sent on a paved highway and other routes from that city, where the enemy army and thousands of its best soldiers were located, with backup from heavy tanks. After 11 days of intensive combat, in which our forces were growing with the arms taken and some small reinforcements, Guisa fell into our hands on November 30, 1958.

This battle was yet another example of the exceptional fighting capacity acquired by our soldiers and of their swift action. Five months previously, in June of the same year, the enemy had launched its last and apparently unbeatable offensive against the general command in La Plata, in the Sierra Maestra. But we were no longer the greenhorns who disembarked on December 2, 1956. Neither were we so numerous. The defense was initiated with approximately 170 men, with the combined and still very limited number of troops commanded by Che, Camilo, Ramiro and Almeida, who had received instructions to move towards Column No. 1's positions, the strategic objective of the enemy offensive. Thus, we had all our columns except the 2nd Eastern Front commanded by Raúl, which was too far away in the northeastern mountains to support our front. Four weeks later, we totaled around 300 fighters. Furthermore, hundreds of young unarmed volunteers were training in the Minas del Frío recruitment school.

CAMILO AND CHE'S MARCH FROM THE SIERRA TO THE ESCAMBRAY

After 74 days of intense fighting, the enemy battalions had suffered close to 1000 casualties, including deaths, wounded and prisoners. We were holding over 440 prisoners and we handed them back a few days later through the International Red Cross. I have written what I remember. Perhaps historians can be more precise concerning this data, based on our documents, which have been preserved, and those that were later discovered in enemy archives. What I can confirm is that over 500 weapons were captured and as they were seized from the army they were used to arm the trainees. Without wasting any time, when the fighting was over, the rebel columns, comprising no more than 900 armed men, moved into the territory dominated by the army towards the center of the country, with the exception of the extensive eastern zone already under the firm control of the Frank País 2nd Eastern Front. Those rebel columns advanced in different directions, creating new war fronts that were rapidly developed. I remained in the command post with a few men. While carrying out those operations, Che and Camilo, the first with approximately 140 men - according to my recollection, without consulting any records - and the second, with around 100, carried out one of the greatest feats among the many I know from history books: they advanced more than 400 kilometers from the Sierra Maestra to the Escambray mountain range - in the wake of a hurricane - through low-lying swampy areas, infested with mosquitoes and enemy troops, under constant aerial vigilance, without guides, without food, and without the logistical support of our underground movement, which had a weak organization in the area of their long march. Outwitting sieges, ambushes, successive lines of contention and bombardments, they reached their goal. Such was our confidence in the fighters who routed the enemy offensive and, most important of all, such was their infinite confidence in themselves and their legendary leaders. They were men of iron. I recommend that young people read and reread the beautiful descriptions contained in Che's Pasajes de la guerra revolucionaria (Episodes of the Revolutionary War).

And as I have almost involuntarily fallen into these reflections of our battles in the Sierra Maestra, to complete the history of the events which led me once again to this beautiful city on that January 1st whose 40th anniversary we are celebrating today, I will tell you that I left La Plata with 30 armed men and 1000 unarmed recruits on November 11. Those valiant and selfless young men had more experience with hunger, bombardments and a lack of everything than they did with arms, given that there wasn't even a spare bullet for real shooting practice. They arrived in enthusiastic waves at the school, from all over, but at that time only one out of every 10 was able to endure those conditions. They nourished our ranks, they were more daring than our older fighters. Inspired by the traditions and stories they heard, they wanted to achieve in one day what others had done over several years.

Collecting small rebel units along the march, plus the weapons from two enemy detachments that came over into our ranks, persuaded by then Commander Quevedo, our worthy and valiant adversary in the battle of Jigüe, and on the understanding that they would not fight against their former comrades in arms, our large column constituted an advance guard of 180 men with weapons of war. In Guisa, Baire, Jiguaní, Maffo and Palma Soriano, scenes of numerous actions, and with the support of other forces as we advanced, the recruits more than realized their dreams of fighting. Partially taking into account losses through the death, injury or illness of already-equipped fighters, and with the arms seized with the taking of Palma, which I estimate at around 700 all together, all the recruits that left La Plata with me six weeks earlier were armed and constituted a formidable force. In Palma alone, 350 weapons were taken.

I should point out that not all the arms that contributed to converting the youth at our Minas del Frío school into front-line soldiers were exclusively the fruit of our triumphs. In mid-December we received what in my judgment constituted the most valuable arms aid from abroad: 150 semiautomatic weapons and a FAL automatic for me, dispatched in the name of the Venezuelan people by Rear Admiral Larrazábal and the revolutionary junta which had assumed power in Venezuela some months before the Cuban triumph. As you can imagine, those arms rapidly went into action and participated in the Jiguaní, Maffo and Palma Soriano combats.

For that reason, after Palma and Maffo fell under our control, there were more than sufficient weapons for our unarmed fighters, and we were able to send the aforementioned 100 troops for the Santiago uprising and a significant number to Belarmino Castilla, with instructions to cut off the retreat of the battalion located in Mayarí.

Since I mentioned the Venezuelan aid, I should state that in our revolutionary struggle we didn't receive arms and ammunition supplies from abroad, except in very exceptional cases, of which, out of the rest I recall or heard about, the Venezuelan consignment was by far the largest. Over 90% of the arms and ammunition with which we armed ourselves and won the war were seized from the enemy in combat. They only amounted to a few thousand but, on an inviolate principle, absolutely all of them were always used on the front line. The events that I have recalled only partially have been commemorated throughout the year that has just ended.

Honor and eternal glory, infinite respect and affection to those that died then to make possible the country's definitive independence; for all those who wrote that epic in the mountains, the plains and cities; to the underground guerrillas and fighters; to those who, after the triumph, died in other glorious missions or loyally gave up their youth and energies to the cause of justice, sovereignty and the redemption of their people; to those who have died and to those who are still living; because, if that January 1 could be spoken of as the triumph attained in five years, five months and five days starting on July 26, 1953, on this anniversary - taking the same starting point - it is accurate to speak of a heroic and admirable struggle of 45 years, five months and five days. (APPLAUSE)

FOR THE YOUNGEST GENERATIONS THE REVOLUTION HAS BARELY BEGUN

Even today, the Revolution has barely begun for the youngest generations. A day like this would have no meaning if I do not speak for them.

Who are those who are present here? In their overwhelming majority they are not the same men, women and young people of that time. The people I am addressing are not the people of that January 1. They are not the same men and women. It is another, distinct people and, at the same time, the same eternal people. (APPLAUSE)

Of the 11,142,700 inhabitants that constitute the country's current population, 7,190,400 had not yet been born; 1,359,698 were under 10 years of age; the overwhelming majority of those then aged 50 and who would now be at least 90 have died, even though those living beyond that age are constantly more numerous.

Of those compatriots, 30% were unable to read and write; I believe that a further 60% never reached sixth grade. Only a few dozen technical colleges and high schools existed, not all of them within the reach of the people; the same with teacher training colleges, plus three universities and one private one. Professors and teachers amounted to 22,000. Possibly 5% of adults, that is, 250,000 persons, could have had more than a sixth-grade education.

There are some statistics I remember.

Today, much better trained teachers and working professors total over 250,000; doctors, 64,000; university graduates, 600,000. Illiteracy has been eradicated, it's extremely rare to find a person who hasn't reached sixth grade. Education is obligatory up to ninth grade; without exception, everyone who reaches that level can continue high-school level studies free of charge. There's no need to refer to absolutely accurate and absolutely exact data. There are facts that no one would dare to deny. Today, with pride, we are the country with the highest per capita indices of teachers, doctors and physical education and sports instructors in the world; and we have the lowest infant and maternal mortality rates in the Third World.

Nonetheless, I don't propose to talk of these and our many other social achievements. There are far more important things than these. What is an absolute reality is that there is no possible comparison between today's people and yesterday's people.

The yesterday's people, illiterate and semi-illiterate, and with really only a minimal political awareness, were capable of making the Revolution, of defending the nation, of subsequently achieving an exceptional political consciousness and initiating a revolutionary process that is unparalleled in this hemisphere and in the world. I do not say that out of any ridiculous chauvinistic spirit, or with the absurd pretension of believing ourselves better than others; I am saying it because, as a result of fate or destiny, the Revolution that was born on that January 1 has been subjected to the hardest trial faced by any revolutionary process in the world.

With the participation of three generations, our heroic people of yesterday and today, our eternal people, have resisted 40 years of aggression, blockade, and economic, political and ideological warfare waged by the strongest and richest imperialist power that has ever existed in the history of the world. The most extraordinary page of glory, and of patriotic and revolutionary determination has been written during these years of the special period, when we were left absolutely alone in the middle of the West, 90 miles from the United States, and we decided to carry on.

NO CAUSE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE CAUSE OF HUMANITY ITSELF

Our people aren't any better than other peoples. Their historic greatness is derived from the singular fact of having been put to the test and having been able to withstand it. It's not a great people in and of itself, but rather a people, which has made itself great, and its capacity to do so is born out of the greatness of the ideas and the righteousness of the causes it defends. There are no other causes like these, and there have never been. Today it's not a matter of selfishly defending a national cause; in today's world an exclusively national cause cannot be a great cause in and of itself; our world, as a consequence of its own development and historical evolution, is globalizing quickly, unhaltingly and irreversibly. Without abandoning national and cultural identities and even the legitimate interests of the peoples of each country, no cause is more important than global causes, that is, the cause of humanity itself.

Nor is it our fault or our merit that for the people of today and tomorrow, the struggle begun on January 1, 1959, has inexorably turned into a struggle along with other peoples for the interests of all humanity. No country on its own, no matter how big or rich - not to mention a medium-sized or small country - can solve its problems on its own. Only those with limited vision, those who are politically shortsighted or blind, or who are completely devoid of concern and sensitivity toward human destiny, could deny that reality.

But the solutions for humanity will not come from the goodwill of those who rule and exploit the world, even though they can't conceive of anything except what constitutes heaven for them and hell for the rest of humanity, a real and inescapable hell.

The economic order, which dominates the planet, will inevitably fall. Even a child in school who knows how to add, subtract, multiply and divide well enough to pass an arithmetic test can understand that.

Many take recourse in the infantile practice of calling those who talk about these subjects skeptics. There are even those who dream of establishing colonies on the moon or Mars. I don't blame them for dreaming. Maybe if they achieve that, it will be the place where some can take refuge, if the brutal and growing aggression against our planet is not halted.

The current system is unsustainable because it is based on blind and chaotic laws which are ruinous and destructive to society and nature.

The very theoreticians of neoliberal globalization, that system's best academics, spokespersons and defenders are unsure, hesitant, contradictory. There are a thousand questions which cannot be answered. It is hypocritical to state that human freedom and the absolute freedom of the market are inseparable concepts, as if laws of this kind, which have emerged from the most selfish, unequal and merciless systems ever known, were compatible with freedom for human beings, who the system has turned into mere commodities.

It would be much more exact to say that without equality and fraternity, which were the sacrosanct watchwords of the bourgeois revolution, there can never be liberty, and that equality and fraternity are absolutely incompatible with the laws of the market.

The tens of millions of children in the world who are forced to work, to prostitute themselves, to supply organs, to sell drugs in order to survive; the hundreds of millions of unemployed, critical poverty, the trafficking of drugs, of immigrants, of human organs, like the colonialism of the past and its dramatic legacy of underdevelopment today, and all of the social calamities in the world today, have arisen from systems based on these laws. It is impossible to forget that the struggle for markets led to the horrific butchery of the two world wars of this century.

We cannot ignore the fact that the principles of the market are an inseparable part of the historic development of humanity, but any rational person would have every right to reject the presumed perpetuation of such social principles as the foundation for the subsequent development of the human species. The most fanatical defenders of and believers in the market have converted it into a new religion. This is how the theology of the market emerged. Its academics, more than scientists, are theologians; for them, it is a question of faith. Out of respect for the genuine religions practiced honestly by billions of people throughout the world and out of respect for genuine theologians, we could simply add that the theology of the market is sectarian, fundamentalist and not ecumenical.

For many other reasons, the current world order is unsustainable. A biotechnologist would say that its genetic map contains numerous genes that lead to its own destruction.

New and unsuspected phenomena are emerging, ones which escape the control of governments and international financial institutions. It is no longer merely a matter of the artificial creation of fabulous wealth with no relation to the real economy. Such is the case of the hundreds of new multimillionaires who have emerged over recent years through the growth in the price of shares on the U.S. stock markets, like a giant balloon that inflates to absurd proportions with the serious risk that it will explode sooner or later. That is what happened in 1929, setting off a deep depression which lasted a decade.

In August of last year, the simple financial crisis in Russia, which produces on 2% of the world's gross domestic product, caused the Dow Jones industrial average, which is the New York stock market's top indicator, to drop 512 points in one day. Panic set in, threatened to cause a crisis like that of Southeast Asia in Latin America and thereby seriously threatened the U.S. economy. They have barely been able to hold off disaster until now. The stocks traded on these stock exchanges include the savings and pension funds of 50% of U.S. citizens. At the time of the 1929 crisis, those figures were only 5%, and there were numerous suicides.

In a globalized world, what happens in any one place has immediate repercussions on the rest of the planet. The recent scare was considerable. The resources of the world's wealthiest countries, summoned together by the United States, were mobilized to head off or attenuate the disaster. Nevertheless, they want to maintain Russia on the brink of the abyss, and are demanding unnecessarily tough conditions from Brazil. The International Monetary Fund has not moved a millimeter from its fundamentalist principles. The World Bank has rebelled and denounced the situation.

Everyone is talking about an international financial crisis; the only ones who haven't caught on are the citizens of the United States. They are spending more than ever, and their savings are less than zero. They're not concerned that their transnationals invest other people's money. Nor does it matter that the trade deficit continues to grow and has now reached 240 billion. They enjoy the privileges of the empire that prints the currency of the world's reserves. The speculators seek refuge in their treasury bonds en masse when there is a crisis. Because the domestic market is large and more money is being spent, the economy appears to be in good shape, although the profits of the corporations have decreased. Megamergers, euphoria; stock prices rise once again. They've gone back to playing Russian roulette. Everything will continue to go well eternally. The system's theoreticians have discovered the philosopher's stone. All points of access are intercepted to keep out the ghosts that could destroy the dream. It is no longer impossible to square the circle. There will never be a crisis.

But is the balloon that continues inflating the only threat and the only speculative gamble? Another phenomenon that is reaching ever more fabulous and uncontrollable proportions is that of speculative operations involving currencies. These operations now represent a minimum of a trillion dollars a day. Some claim it to be 1.5 trillion. Scarcely 14 years ago, this figure was only 150 billion dollars a year. There could be confusion regarding the figures. It is difficult to express them, and even more so to translate them from English to Spanish. What we call a billion in Spanish, that is, a million million, is a trillion in North American English. On the other hand, a billion in North American English is a thousand million in Spanish. Now they have come up with the milliard, which means a thousand million in both Spanish and English. These language difficulties demonstrate how difficult it is to follow and comprehend the fabulous figures that reflect the degree of speculation in the current world economic order. The immense majority of the world's nations pay for it with the perennial risk of ruin. The slightest carelessness can lead the speculators to attack, devaluating the currency in any one of these nations, and liquidating their hard currency reserves, built up over decades perhaps, in a matter of days. The world order has created the conditions for this. Absolutely no one is or can be safe. The wolves, grouped in packs and aided by computer programs, know where to attack, when to attack and why to attack.

THERE ARE WORDS THAT CANNOT BE PRONOUNCED IN THE TEMPLE OF THE FANATICS OF THE IMPOSED WORLD ORDER

Fourteen years ago, when this speculation was 2000 times less, a Nobel laureate in economics proposed a 1% tax on every speculative operation of this kind. Today the total that would have been generated through this 1% would be sufficient to develop all of the countries of the Third World. It would be a way of regulating and holding back this harmful speculation. But, regulate? This would clash with the purest fundamentalist doctrine. There are words that cannot be pronounced in the temple of the fanatics of the imposed world order. For example: regulation, public enterprise, economic development program, any minimal form of state planning, influence or participation in the economic area. All of this disturbs the idyllic dream of the free market and private enterprise paradise. Everything should be deregulated, even the labor market. Unemployment benefits should be reduced to the bare minimum, so as not to support "bums" and "freeloaders." The pension system should be restructured and privatized. The state should only concern itself with the police and the army, to maintain order, represses protest and wage war. It is not even permissible for it to participate in any way in the monetary policies of the central bank; this must be absolutely independent. Louis XIV would truly suffer, because if he said, "I am the state," today he would have to add, "I am absolutely nothing."

Apart from the frightful speculation with currencies, there has been an accelerated and unbelievable growth in so-called hedge funds and the derivatives market, another rather new term. I won't try to explain it. It's complicated. It would take a lot of time. I'll simply say that it is an additional system of speculative gambling, another enormous casino where the players bet anything and everything, based on sophisticated risk calculations generated by computers, high-level programmers and economic experts. They exploit insecurity and use the money in the banks' savings accounts. They have practically no restrictions, make huge profits and can provoke disasters.

The fact that the current economic order is unsustainable is evidenced by the very vulnerability and weakness of the system, which has turned the planet into a gigantic casino, and turned millions of citizens and sometimes even entire societies into gamblers, adulterating the function of money and of investments, given that they pursue neither the production nor the growth of the world's wealth, but rather a means to make money with money. Such a deformation will inevitably lead the world economy towards disaster.

A recent incident, which took place in the United States, has been the source of scandal and profound concern. One of the hedge funds that I mentioned and tried to explain in essence, precisely the most famous one in the United States, Long Term Capital Management, which has two Nobel laureates in economy and some of the best computer programmers in the world, and annual profits of over 30%, was on the verge of bankruptcy, which would have had, it would seem, incalculable consequences.

Backed by the prestige it had acquired and depending blindly in the infallibility of its famed programmers and Nobel Prize winners in economics, with a fund of only 4.5 million dollars, it mobilized funds from 75 different banks, totaling 120 billion dollars, for its speculative operations; that is, it obtained over 25 dollars in savings for every dollar of its own funds. That procedure broke all the parameters and supposed financial practices. The calculations and the programs failed. The losses were considerable; and bankruptcy - which is a dramatic word in this sphere - was inevitable. It was just a matter of days. The U.S. Federal Reserve System went to the rescue of the hedge fund, contradicting all the tenets of the United States and neoliberal philosophy, given that this was considered irresponsible behavior on the part of that kind of institution. According to established principles, the hedge fund had to go bankrupt, the law of the market would teach it a lesson by imposing the relevant corrective. A scandal broke out. The Senate summoned Greenspan, the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board; he was called on to make a statement. This senior official, who came from Wall Street, is seen as one of the most expert and eminent figures in the U.S. economy. The principal merit for the current administration's economic success is attributed to him and he is currently enjoying special praise in financial and press circles as the man who halted the stock market crisis in the United States, by lowering interest rates three times in succession. After the president, he is viewed as the most important person in the country. Well, this famous and esteemed chairman of the Federal Reserve System informed the Senate that, if the hedge fund wasn't saved, it would lead to an economic catastrophe which would affect the United States and the entire world.

Where is the solidity of an economic order in which the action, qualified as adventurous and irresponsible, of a speculative institution which possessed a mere 4.5 billion dollars could lead the United States and the world to an economic disaster?

When a weakness and an immunological failure of such magnitude is perceived within the system, it could be diagnosed as suffering from something very similar to AIDS.

I don't wish to put forward any more arguments. Many other problems exist within the world economy. The prevailing order flip-flops between inflation, recession, deflation, potential overproduction crises, and sustained slumps of basic products. Countries as immensely rich as Saudi Arabia now have budget and trade deficits, even through every day they export eight million barrels of oil. Optimistic growth forecasts are evaporating. No one has the slightest idea of how to solve the problems of the Third World. What capital goods, technology, distribution networks, export credits do they have to seek markets, compete and export? Where are the consumers of their products? How are the resources to be found for health care in Africa, where 22 million HIV-positive persons would require, at current prices, 200 billion dollars every year to control one sole disease? How many will die before a protective vaccine or a medicine is found to eliminate the disease?

HOPEFULLY SOLUTIONS WON'T BE FOUND AS A RESULT OF ECONOMIC CRISES

The world needs some leadership to confront its current realities. There are already six billion inhabitants on the planet. It is virtually certain that in just 50 years' time there will be 9.5 billion. Guaranteeing food, health care, education, employment, clothing, footwear, homes, drinking water, electricity and transportation for such an extraordinary number of persons who will be living precisely in the poorest countries will be a colossal challenge. First, consumption standards will have to be defined. We cannot continue introducing the tastes and ways of life inspired by the industrialized societies' wasteful model, which would be suicidal in addition to being impossible. The world's development must be programmed. That task cannot remain in the hands of the transnationals and left up to the blind and chaotic laws of the market. The United Nations is a good basis for this task, since it has a lot of information and experience; we must strive to make it more democratic, to put an end to the Security Council's dictatorship, and the dictatorship within the Council itself, or at least to increase the number of its permanent members so that the Third World is properly represented, with all the prerogatives enjoyed by the current members and changing the rules on decision making. Furthermore, the functions and authority of the General Assembly must be broadened.

Hopefully solutions won't be found as a result of economic crises. Billions of people in the Third World would be affected. An elemental awareness of the technological realities and the destructive power of modern weapons obliges us to think about the duty to prevent the inevitable conflicts of interest from leading to bloody wars.

The existence of a single superpower, of a global and asphyxiating economic order, makes it difficult - perhaps impossible - for even a revolution such as ours to survive, if it had been born today instead of when if could count on a source of support, in a world which was then bipolar. Because of that support, our country had the necessary time to develop an invincible capacity for resistance and to make known, in the international arena, the strong influence of its example and heroism, in order to carry out a great battle of ideas in all forums.

Peoples will keep on struggling, the masses will play an important and decisive role in those struggles, which in essence will be their response to the poverty and suffering to which they have been subjected, and thousands of creative and ingenious forms of pressure and political action will emerge. Economic crises and the absence of solutions within the established international economic system will destabilize many governments.

We are living though a stage in which events move more quickly than consciousness of the realities under which we suffer. We must sow ideas and unmask deceit, sophism and hypocrisy, using methods and means, which counteract the disinformation and institutionalized lies. The experience of 40 years of slander falling upon Cuba like torrential rain has taught us to trust the people's instincts and intelligence.

The European countries have given the world a good example of what can be achieved through the use of reason and intelligence. After centuries of internecine wars, they understood that even though they were wealthy industrialized countries, they couldn't survive isolated from one another. Soros, a well-known personality in the world of finance, and his group, in a speculative assault, brought Britain to its knees, despite the fact that Britain was once the head of a great empire, the undisputed queen of finances and the former ruler of the world's reserve currency, a role now played by the dollar and the United States.

The franc, peseta and lira also suffered the damage wrought by speculation. The dollar and the euro are keeping watch over one another. The dollar now faces a prospective adversary. The United States is anxiously wagering that the new currency will struggle and fail. We are keeping a close eye on events.

Anguish, uncertainty and doubt lead some to seek out eclectic alternatives. The world, nevertheless, has no other alternative to neoliberal globalization, which is dehumanizing, morally and socially indefensible, and ecologically and economically unsustainable, than a fair distribution of the riches that human beings are capable of creating with their dedicated labor and fertile intelligence. May there be an end to the tyranny of an order that imposes blind, anarchic and chaotic principles, that is leading the human species towards the abyss. May nature be saved. May national identities be preserved, and the cultures of all nations protected. May equality, fraternity, and with them, true liberty, prevail. The unfathomable differences between the rich and poor within each country and between countries cannot continue growing. They must, on the contrary, progressively diminish until they disappear someday. May merit, capacity, creative spirit, and what each individual actually contributes to the welfare of humanity, as opposed to theft, speculation, and the exploitation of the weakest determine differences. May humanism be genuinely practiced, with concrete actions and not hypocritical slogans.

TODAY'S STRUGGLE IS TOUGH AND DIFFICULT

Dear compatriots:

The nation that is waging the heroic battle of the special period to save the homeland, the Revolution and the conquests of socialism is advancing irrepressibly towards its goals, in the same way that the fighters led by Camilo and Che advanced from the Sierra Maestra to the Escambray. As Mella said, the future must always be better. Let's confirm this with the goals we have set ourselves for 1999. Let's consolidate and strengthen, work, struggle and fight with the spirit with which our heroic compatriots fought in Uvero, in the glorious days of the major enemy offensive, in the battles and the events we have recalled today. We have left behind the setback in Alegría de Pío, we have passed through Cinco Palmas, we have gathered forces, and now we are capable of triumph, just as 300 triumphed over 10,000; we are now much stronger, and certain of victory. (APPLAUSE)

To all of our compatriots, and especially the young, I assure you that the next 40 years will be decisive for the world. Before you there are tasks that are incomparably more complex and difficult. New glorious goals await you; the honor of being Cuban revolutionaries demands it. We will struggle for our nation and for humanity. And our voice can reach and will reach very far away.

Today's struggle is tough and difficult. In the ideological war, as in armed battles, there are also casualties. Not everyone has the courage to withstand these tough times and difficult conditions.

I was recalling today that in the midst of the war, in the midst of the bombings and countless deprivations, of all the young volunteers who entered the school, one in ten was able to withstand it; but that one was worth ten, a hundred, a thousand. By strengthening awareness, forming character, educating the young in the difficult school of life in our era, sowing solid ideas, using arguments that are irrefutable, preaching through example and trusting in the honor of humankind, we can ensure that for every ten, nine remain in their battle posts alongside the flag, the Revolution and the homeland. (APPLAUSE)

Socialism or death! Patria o muerte Venceremos! (OVATION)


Visit the Militant and other communist net resources:

The Militant
gopher://gopher.igc.apc.org:/11/pubs/militant

Pathfinder Press
gopher://ftp.std.com/11/Book%20Sellers/Pathfinder%20Press

Granma International
http://www.granma.cu/

Perspectiva Mundial
gopher://gopher.igc.apc.org:70/11/pubs/pm